<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Day 6 &#8211; 10 Days of Ubuntu 10.10 Feature Requests</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tannerhelland.com/commentary/ubuntu-linux/day-6-ubuntu-10-10-features/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tannerhelland.com/commentary/ubuntu-linux/day-6-ubuntu-10-10-features/</link>
	<description>Home of the award-winning author, VG composer, and programmer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:58:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.tannerhelland.com/commentary/ubuntu-linux/day-6-ubuntu-10-10-features/comment-page-1/#comment-945</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 05:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tannerhelland.com/?p=1293#comment-945</guid>
		<description>Both &lt;a href=&quot;https://launchpad.net/deja-dup&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Déjà Dup&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.oak-tree.us/blog/index.php/science-and-technology/time-drive&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Time Drive&lt;/a&gt; look like better alternatives to Back in Time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both <a  href="https://launchpad.net/deja-dup" rel="nofollow">Déjà Dup</a> <a  href="http://www.oak-tree.us/blog/index.php/science-and-technology/time-drive" rel="nofollow">Time Drive</a> look like better alternatives to Back in Time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cdmdotnet</title>
		<link>http://www.tannerhelland.com/commentary/ubuntu-linux/day-6-ubuntu-10-10-features/comment-page-1/#comment-897</link>
		<dc:creator>cdmdotnet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 02:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tannerhelland.com/?p=1293#comment-897</guid>
		<description>Personally I&#039;d be happy with something as simple as:
* GUI
* easily scheduled backups - don&#039;t care if it uses cron jobs, just so long as it does it all for me and is GUI controlled
* imcremental changes, only backs up changes ( even if it&#039;s the whole file and not it&#039;s binary changes) 
* BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY compressable - tars cool - but with the incramental filenames so the backup tar file doesn&#039;t just balloon with each backup.

If that existed I&#039;d be happy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally I&#8217;d be happy with something as simple as:<br />
* GUI<br />
* easily scheduled backups &#8211; don&#8217;t care if it uses cron jobs, just so long as it does it all for me and is GUI controlled<br />
* imcremental changes, only backs up changes ( even if it&#8217;s the whole file and not it&#8217;s binary changes)<br />
* BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY compressable &#8211; tars cool &#8211; but with the incramental filenames so the backup tar file doesn&#8217;t just balloon with each backup.</p>
<p>If that existed I&#8217;d be happy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lennie</title>
		<link>http://www.tannerhelland.com/commentary/ubuntu-linux/day-6-ubuntu-10-10-features/comment-page-1/#comment-797</link>
		<dc:creator>Lennie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 22:44:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tannerhelland.com/?p=1293#comment-797</guid>
		<description>Did you see the Duplicty front-end Deja-vu, yet ? Diplicity is for backup to any place, might not even be a trusted place. Because it&#039;s encrypted, compressed, just transfers what is needed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you see the Duplicty front-end Deja-vu, yet ? Diplicity is for backup to any place, might not even be a trusted place. Because it&#8217;s encrypted, compressed, just transfers what is needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gen2ly</title>
		<link>http://www.tannerhelland.com/commentary/ubuntu-linux/day-6-ubuntu-10-10-features/comment-page-1/#comment-772</link>
		<dc:creator>Gen2ly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 05:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tannerhelland.com/?p=1293#comment-772</guid>
		<description>Good stuff.  The AppCenter, Software Center... I believe is what Ubuntu needs to triage first.  A comprehensive, tagged, rated, AppStore :) could really give Ubuntu a nice touch.  For music players, Linux is kinda of screwed right now.  The last decent one (again IMHO) was Amarok 1.4.  Amarok 2 is a bloody mess, Rhythmbox is very basic, Banshee is ok.  Not a big fan of windows media player either, we need FooBar for Linux, I guess.

Nice article(s).  Keep it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good stuff.  The AppCenter, Software Center&#8230; I believe is what Ubuntu needs to triage first.  A comprehensive, tagged, rated, AppStore :) could really give Ubuntu a nice touch.  For music players, Linux is kinda of screwed right now.  The last decent one (again IMHO) was Amarok 1.4.  Amarok 2 is a bloody mess, Rhythmbox is very basic, Banshee is ok.  Not a big fan of windows media player either, we need FooBar for Linux, I guess.</p>
<p>Nice article(s).  Keep it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
